Thurston closes for renovation and is expected to reopen by fall 2022.
College and city life were, to an Ohio farmer’s son, a wondrous fire hose of experience—even the night it all nearly crumbled.
I arrived at Thurston Hall in the fall of 1974 to the windows all open with stereos facing out toward F Street in a cacophony of party.
In applying to college, my only thought was escape from my Ohio farm upbringing. Our local judge played on the GW football team in the 1930s, and I loved politics, so GW was the only college to which I applied.
I lived on the International Floor in a six-person corner unit. My roommates and I talked sex and girls and science and pop culture, politics and why we left our families.
I cried the first night, but never again.
My finances were desperate, but with student loans and work—as an usher at Lisner Auditorium and as a telephone operator at a switchboard (primarily serving the hospital … but also sometimes connecting the lines of two friends and listening to the confusion unfold)—I paid for my tuition, dormitory and food ticket.
Before Thurston, where I stayed my freshman and sophomore years, I’d never seen the poverty of a big city. I’d also never tasted alcohol (or any drug), an awakening that led my sophomore roommate and me to stock an exotic bar in our closet, and launched an interest in learning about wine. And our location at the center of the federal government became a reality of daily life. Friends in Thurston worked in the State Department, in the White House and in Congress—myself included, interning for Sen. John Glenn, the astronaut.
Walking to Thurston in the dark one night after studying at the library, Sen. Bob Dole, who would be Gerald Ford’s running mate, popped out of the F Street Club across the street. He talked with me for 15 minutes. When I arrived at my room, I called my parents to tell them the news. My mother met me with an equal report. “We have good news ourselves: We had a second crop of lima beans!”
Never have I forgotten the distinction between values inside of the D.C. Beltway, and the reality everywhere else.
To begin my first year of law school, in fall 1979, the housing office hired me to be an RA on Thurston’s fifth floor—but there was a shakeup on the floor that spring and they asked me to step in early. The housing director told me that I should not worry about programming, but just survive.
I was optimistic. I should have known better.
Thurston had continued to get more and more out of hand in those years. Every night someone would pull a fire alarm, requiring evacuation. Residents routinely used fire extinguishers as squirt guns and would put ammonium nitrate on door handles to explode upon touch.
When I unexpectedly took over as the RA, there was always hateful graffiti or property damage, as though it were a group joke instead of a safe residence. Students were just getting more and more brazen.
On April 19, a friend and I awoke to fire coming through all four sides of the door to my room. I thought, This place is going to burn down; I could hear everybody screaming through the windows into Thurston’s central courtyard trying to get out.
With the smoke and fire consuming my room, I reached out of the window and grabbed a copper utility wire, wrapped it around my right hand and slid down three stories with my friend, and fell the last two to safety.
I was fine, it seemed, except for my right hand where the wire cut down to the bone. The student in the room next to mine suffered burns on most of his body.
The guilt over my inability to help my residents was painful. I’d always felt overly responsible, even growing up. In Thurston I felt like I was there to keep order and I didn’t do that. That was the joke: no one could keep order. But I remember my students’ screaming, “help me, help me, help me.” That just doesn’t go away.
I recall awakening one morning afterward, showering and dressing. As I sat on the edge of my bed tying my shoes, I looked at the clock and noted the time to go to breakfast. Next, I returned my gaze to the clock and noted the time to go to dinner. I had sat on the bed unconscious the entire day. For a short time, I would find myself walking into street signs outside.
In the aftermath, I was impossibly conflicted. To the housing office, I was their on-site contact with necessary answers; to fifth floor residents, I was the guy to make things better. I mostly tried to focus my energy on putting others at ease—being positive and encouraging, asking how they perceived the fire and what I could do to help. It was a big moment of growth for everybody who was involved, and it was formative for me, too.
At age 64, I see the lateral scar on the back of my right hand, ever fading with the memory. In the long view, the fire was a minor part of my great time at GW—just one night in seven years. It was just another growing experience of many. — Luther L. Liggett, BA ’78, JD ’81
‘For Exceptional Performance While Under Fire‘
In my senior year, I was one of the RAs on the eighth floor of Thurston in the spring of 1979 when there was a significant fire in the building. This certificate was created by another RA in Thurston and presented to each of us who were on the residence hall staff that night.
The figures in the upper-right reflect part of my own story: The smoke got so thick on the eighth floor that, after getting students to evacuate, a security guard and I retreated into my room on the interior of the building. We put some wet towels at the foot of the door and went into the bathroom to move farther from the smoke. The RAs had been well trained to counsel students to keep their window screens undamaged, or a fine would be assessed. On that night of the fire, the guard opened my bathroom window and pushed out the screen. My first thought was that I would get assessed for my now missing screen. — Jim McPhee, BA ’79
"Adulting"
A Faculty Perspective
I was frankly a little terrified. It’s Thurston, it has a reputation. D.C. tour guides would go by on Segways and I remember distinctly my first semester one of those guides pointing to the building and saying, “That’s Thurston Hall of the George Washington University. It’s the third largest freshman dorm in the country.” But I haven’t found that Thurston lives up to its reputation. It’s delightful.
I’m currently the faculty-in-residence, and I’m in my fifth year. There’s a faculty apartment—if you head off to the right when you enter, just before the elevator there’s a little hallway, and my apartment is at the end of that hallway. It’s a proper apartment with a kitchen, dishwasher, and washer and dryer. It has a huge front room and that’s my public space, where I host students. So I have my privacy and then I can also open it up and invite in these wonderful young people who are in this threshold year of their lives, and are curious and open and smart.
"There’s a faculty apartment—if you head off to the right when you enter, just before the elevator there’s a little hallway, and my apartment is at the end of that hallway. It’s a proper apartment with a kitchen, dishwasher, and washer and dryer."
I’d known about the faculty-in-residence program. And as I was moving into a more administrative role as deputy director of the Writing in the Disciplines program, and was going to have more meetings and a more varied role on campus, I thought it’d be really great not to have a commute. And I teach in the first-year writing program—I really like first-year students. I think it’s a very exciting year. Plus I had never lived in a dorm. I went to community college for a couple of years and then I transferred to Georgetown and lived off-campus. So I thought this would be new and different, and that was part of the appeal.
When an opening came up, I sold my condo in Congress Heights and moved to Thurston.
I think a faculty-in-residence was a bit unusual for the students to wrap their heads around, and there was some uncertainty about my role, but then again first-year students also don’t really know what to expect.
It was easy for me to introduce myself to them as somebody who taught in the first-year writing program, which every student participates in. I began hosting events to help them explore the city’s institutions, history and longstanding issues, like gentrification—we’ve done walking tours of Shaw with a community organization, followed by a meal at Ben’s Chili Bowl, and every semester we visit NPR to spend time with film critic Bob Mondello—as well as a weekly “Cookies and Conversation” event. Students come by and we’ll chat or watch a movie or talk about music, and other kinds of conversations emerge from that.
The RAs and the other staff deal with “roommate disputes,” but sometimes I can help a student think creatively about issues in their academic or social lives. Most students are probably coming from relatively homogeneous communities and then suddenly they have a thousand neighbors from all over the place, not to mention their roommates. Or a student has been written up by GWPD and is terrified about what consequences will be. Or how a student might approach their parents about changing a major. Especially in the first year students might be concerned that something they could do would totally ruin their lives. But, with a few exceptions, there really isn’t anything.
The students are able to—and do—knock on my door and say, “I’d like to talk to an adult about this,” whatever the thing is. Sometimes they’re really clear that they’re not seeking advice from me; they have some ideas and just want me to be a sounding board. I am perceived as the approachable adult in the building. I’m their neighbor.
And I’m constantly learning from them. Every generation has a new take on the world. Hearing the things that they’re thinking about, the concerns they have, what they see as constraints and what they see as possibilities, that’s always shifting, and it’s helpful to me to be aware of all that when I’m teaching. I can also help colleagues understand what concerns are surfacing in the dorm, what students seem to be anxious about, and if classes are looking light I can legitimately report half the dorm is down with the Thurston Plague this week.
Something I didn’t expect was how much joy there would be with this, like when people who’ve been coming to “Cookies and Conversation” knock on the door Halloween night to show off their costumes. I had a student last week who’d been bemoaning the challenges that she had in getting a work-study job, and this week she came by and said, “I don’t want a cookie, I just want to let you know I got a job!” You get to share highlights with them. — Randi Kristensen, deputy director of GW’s Writing in the Disciplines program, assistant professor of writing and faculty-in-residence at Thurston Hall (as told to the author)
Turning Off the Music(al)
The show, Nine Stories and A Basement: A Thurston Musical, is about a girl, Mikaela, coming
back to Thurston as an RA for her senior year. On her first night back, Mikaela falls asleep and dreams her entire freshman year over again, but set in the 1960s.
At the end of that first act there’s a fire, based on the actual 1979 fire, and Mikaela is trapped in the building. At that moment she wakes up from the dream, and then has to finish her senior year—and Thurston’s last—in the present day.
The play gives us a chance to relive the Thurston of the past and some of the issues of the late ’60s, like the treatment of women on campus, and the parallels between social activism then and today. And it’s symbolic of the hardship people go through while they’re in college; the growth that’s required. It’s not going to be easy and you’re going to come out a different person. The question of the first act is, essentially: Where do I stand if everything’s burned? And then the question of the second act is: OK, I need to move forward. I have all this baggage, what am I going to leave behind, and what am I going to take with me?
The process so far has been a whirlwind, from doing a lot of the research and the writing on my own, to then getting a cast and bringing them into that process. It’s a “devised show,” which means the cast has a role in developing the characters and the story. Thurston encapsulates so many stories, and I want to make sure the cast feels like their stories are being represented.
Thurston is the only place I’ve lived on campus. I was there as a freshman, then as an RA my sophomore year. I studied abroad junior year and returned to Thurston as an RA this year. Being surrounded by people who are in such a dynamic time in their lives, I think I’ve been able to hold on to that wonderment of the world and of college a bit longer than a lot of my peers. I just get to see people doing such human things, like making friends—freshmen showing up to college and attaching onto the nearest person they find because they’re scared and in a new place, and then you see them adjusting to this new way of life.
Going into this play, I wanted it to be a place for people to celebrate Thurston, and then to let go of it.
Letting go will be something different for the people in my year: We’re going to be the first class in nearly 60 years that doesn’t get to return to Thurston for all of the memories created there. It’s going to be a totally different building inside.
It’s a complicated feeling. This is probably for the better—the building needs to be renovated—and it’s good to let go and to move on and not have something you’re attached to, to kind of hold you back. But at the same time it’s nice to have the physical marker to spur memories.
I’ve been giving alumni tours every year that I’ve been here, and I see what they experience by coming back. That gave some inspiration for the play in a lot of ways. For instance, my freshman year, I brought an alumnus from the ’60s to my room and they said, “This is it. This is the room where we would put a ladder across the alleyway between Mitchell and Thurston and the men would climb across the ladder into the all-women Thurston dorm to avoid the curfew.”
This year for alumni weekend I interviewed alumni to get more material for the show, and people came in and cried as they spoke.
This was a transformational home for so many people, and I just want to give them that space to let them breathe for a second and say: Yeah, this is an odd treasure of a place that you’re not quite sure is an actual treasure, but it did a lot and it won’t be there anymore in the same way.
I still have to finish the play, but now from home. I have a piano there and all of my recording equipment and a computer, so that’s still part of the online coursework that needs to get done, but it likely won’t be performed. That’s the unfortunate conclusion that I’m still coming to grips with. This was going to be a big thing for me in finding similar work after college.
I hate hurried goodbyes, and that’s pretty much what it’s going to be right now, both with friends and for this goodbye to Thurston. We’ll have to come back to get the rest of our stuff, so I will see the building. But this March move-out is pretty much our goodbye. — Andrew Hesbacher, CCAS ’20, majoring in international affairs and music (as told to the author)
* As the campus response to the novel coronavirus evolved, eventually keeping students off-campus and learning remotely for the rest of the spring semester, so too did Andrew Hesbacher’s plans. Instead of a musical, he made a documentary about life inside Thurston based on interviews with alumni.
The Future
Thurston Redux
For more than 50 years, Thurston Hall has played a central role in GW campus life. Thousands of relationships, stories and memories shared among members of the GW community emanate from that residence hall, which has developed a stature on campus unlike any other.
But time and significant use have taken their toll on the facility, which currently houses nearly 40 percent of GW’s first-year undergraduate students.
Reimagining this storied residence hall is a key element of the university’s strategic initiative to create a preeminent student experience. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has altered life on the GW campus dramatically.
While the safety and health of our students have always been top concerns, more than ever we recognize the need to create a place for students to call home at GW that enhances both physical and mental health. For all these reasons, the Thurston Hall renovation is a priority that will continue to move forward, the only capital project to do so in a challenging environment.
The two-year endeavor—now under way with the building scheduled to re-open in fall 2022—will offer former residents and friends of Thurston multiple opportunities to engage and contribute to its transformation.
The goal is to produce new and inviting social, academic and residential spaces for students to live and learn as well as to upgrade the building infrastructure. This will make the building more functional, sustainable and community-oriented.
There will be new three-season atrium, student lounge, and spaces with natural light feature prominently in the concept for a complete interior renovation.
The concept also includes a multi-purpose space, food service and penthouse student space offering views of the surrounding city. The hall will house roughly 825 students in doubles and singles as well as faculty-in-residence and residential life staff.
VMDO Architects, based in Charlottesville, Va., designed the renovation concept.